Skip to content.

Choosing GPU Infrastructure for LLM Training in 2025: NVIDIA H100 vs. H200 vs. B200

Lorem ipsum dolor sit 1

So, you had a great idea for how to use AI and now you’re turning that idea into reality. You’ve got a killer use case, a large data set, and now it’s time to get to training. The next question to answer is what kind of hardware do you need in order to train, fine-tune, and deploy your great idea.

You know you need powerful hardware, but there are many options to choose from. At one level, it’s simple. Newer more powerful GPUs will be faster. They are also more expensive and harder to get access to. This view also doesn’t take into account a number of other variables such as - memory, architecture differences, and suitability for long-context models - that when factored in may dramatically (or not) affect your choice.

This guide is intended to help AI teams choose the best infrastructure for training, fine-tuning, and running advanced LLMs. We'll cover the variables mentioned above as well as the particular strengths of the most popular GPUs available today.

NVIDIA’s Latest GPU Lineup

NVIDIA H100 (Hopper)

Released in 2022, H100 GPUs significantly improved LLM training with:

  • 80GB HBM3 memory (3.35 TB/s bandwidth)
  • FP8 precision support, delivering ~2 PFLOPS compute
  • Great performance improvements over earlier GPUs (like A100)

H100 quickly became a reliable choice for many AI workloads.

NVIDIA H200 (Enhanced Hopper)

Launched in 2024 - 25, H200 keeps the Hopper architecture but increases memory:

  • 141GB HBM3e memory (~4.8 TB/s bandwidth)
  • Similar FP8 compute throughput as H100 (~2 PFLOPS)
  • Better suited to memory-intensive models or longer contexts

H200 improves throughput (up to 1.6× faster than H100) by fitting larger batches into memory, making training and inference smoother.

NVIDIA B200 (Blackwell)

The new flagship (2025), B200 introduces major upgrades:

  • 192GB HBM3e memory (dual-die, ~8.0 TB/s bandwidth)
  • Massive compute (~4.5 PFLOPS FP8 dense, up to ~9 PFLOPS with FP4)
  • Dual-chip architecture, appearing as a single GPU
  • Next-gen Transformer Engine supporting FP4 precision for inference
  • 5th-gen NVLink (1.8 TB/s), improving multi-GPU scalability

The B200 significantly speeds training (up to ~4× H100) and inference (up to 30× H100), perfect for the largest models and extreme contexts.

Quick comparison

Key Considerations for Choosing GPUs

Memory Capacity & Bandwidth

LLMs with long contexts (like DeepSeek-R1’s 128K tokens) heavily rely on GPU memory.

H100 (80GB)

Great for models up to ~70B parameters; struggles with extreme contexts.

H200 (141GB)

Nearly double H100 memory, ideal for bigger models (100B+) or longer contexts.

B200 (192GB)

Even larger capacity, easily handling huge models and very long contexts with high efficiency.

Compute Performance & Precision (FP8 to FP4)

Compute performance determines training speed.

H100

Introduced FP8 training, doubling compute throughput compared to FP16.

H200

Same compute throughput as H100, but the increased memory improves practical throughput by removing bottlenecks.

B200

Offers significant compute improvements (up to ~4.5 PFLOPS FP8), dual-chip design, and new FP4 format for ultra-fast inference. Expect ~2 - 3× faster training than H100/H200 and dramatic improvements in inference speed.

Architectural Differences: Hopper vs. Blackwell

Architectural features influence scaling and usability:

  • Monolithic (H100/H200) vs. Dual-chip (B200):
    B200 provides more compute and memory, simplifying scaling for extremely large models.
  • NVLink Connectivity:
    B200’s NVLink 5 (1.8 TB/s) doubles H100’s connectivity, improving multi-GPU training efficiency dramatically.
  • Other enhancements in B200:
    Hardware reliability (RAS Engine), secure AI computing, and data decompression hardware - making it ideal for enterprise-scale deployments.

Suitability by Workload

Pre-training Large Models (100B+ parameters)

B200

Excels here, reducing the GPU count required significantly.

H200

Slightly better than H100 for model size and sequence lengths.

H100

Remains reliable but might require more GPUs and longer training times.

Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning (RLHF)

H200

Is ideal due to its expanded memory (especially helpful with long context).

H100

Usually sufficient, offering good value.

b200

Beneficial mainly if rapid iteration or extremely large context windows are required.

Long-context Inference and RAG

B200 and H200

Significantly outperform H100, easily handling large-context inference.

B200

Particularly shines due to its dual-die memory and FP4 precision, providing unmatched throughput for serving workloads.

Performance Benchmarks (Real-World Estimates)

Inference:

A single B200 roughly matches the performance of 3 - 4 H100 GPUs.

training:

B200 expected to be ~2.5× faster than H200/H100 in most practical scenarios. Official benchmarks may show even higher potential gains (~4× H100).

Multi-gpu scaling:

Blackwell’s improved NVLink provides better scaling efficiency, important for multi-node GPU clusters training trillion-parameter models.

  • H100: Widely available, prices dropping due to maturity.

  • H200: Slightly more expensive than H100 (10 - 20%), availability ramping up.

  • B200: High premium initially (25%+ over H200), limited availability early in 2025 but exceptional long-term performance and efficiency.


Pricing & Availability

H100

Widely available, prices dropping due to maturity.

H200

Slightly more expensive than H100 (10 - 20%), availability ramping up.

B200

High premium initially (25%+ over H200), limited availability early in 2025 but exceptional long-term performance and efficiency.

Cloud vs. On-Premise

  • Cloud: Offers immediate, flexible access (AWS, Azure, Google). Ideal for rapid prototyping and scaling.

  • On-Prem: High initial investment but can be more cost-effective and controlled at scale, especially with B200’s energy efficiency.

Planning Your GPU Infrastructure (Next 6 - 12 Months)

Evaluate Model Requirements:

Choose H100 for mainstream LLMs (up to 70B). Consider H200/B200 for longer contexts or larger models.

Leverage Cloud:

Choose H100 for mainstream LLMs (up to 70B). Consider H200/B200 for longer contexts or larger models.

Budget Strategically:

If your project requires rapid results now, use H100/H200. If planning for next-generation models, prepare to adopt B200.

Optimize Software Stack:

Adopt NVIDIA’s latest CUDA libraries and Transformer Engine features to maximize GPU hardware utilization.

Consider Future-Proofing:

Investing in B200 prepares you for future larger-scale models and significantly longer contexts, potentially avoiding frequent upgrades.

Conclusion

Choosing between NVIDIA’s H100, H200, and B200 GPUs depends on your specific LLM training and inference needs:

H100

Reliable, widely available GPU, ideal for standard-sized LLM training and fine-tuning.

H200

Offers significant memory benefits for slightly larger models and longer contexts.

b200

Cutting-edge performance, optimized for extreme model sizes, longer contexts, and future scalability - worth the premium for future-proofing your AI infrastructure.

Aligning GPU selection with model complexity, context length, and scaling goals, will help you get your project to market efficiently and enable scaling over time as users all over the world fall in love with and come to depend on the outcome of your big idea.