Best GPUs for LLM inference in 2025

```html

Large language model inference demands enormous computational resources because these models process billions or trillions of parameters to generate each response. The GPU you choose directly affects how fast your models run, how much you spend on hardware or cloud costs, and whether you can even run certain models at all. This guide evaluates GPU options across different budgets and performance needs to help you make the right choice for your specific use case.

Understanding llm inference requirements

LLM inference works by loading a trained model into GPU memory and using the GPU's parallel processing cores to perform matrix calculations that transform input text into output predictions. The GPU serves as the computational engine that processes these massive neural networks in real-time, with memory storing the model weights and compute cores handling the mathematical operations.

Several key GPU characteristics determine performance for LLM inference. Memory capacity sets the maximum size of models you can run - larger models with more parameters require more VRAM to store their weights. A 7B parameter model typically needs 14GB of VRAM, while 70B parameter models require 140GB or more. Memory bandwidth controls how quickly the GPU can access model data, directly impacting inference speed and throughput. Higher bandwidth means faster token generation and better performance when serving multiple users. Specialized tensor cores accelerate the matrix multiplication operations that form the backbone of neural network inference, providing significant speedups over standard CUDA cores. Task-specific features like mixed-precision support, optimized attention mechanisms, and hardware-accelerated transformations can dramatically improve efficiency for modern transformer-based models.

Hardware requirements scale with workload complexity. Small-scale projects running 7B parameter models need 16-24GB VRAM and can work with consumer GPUs. Medium-scale deployments handling 13B-30B parameter models require 32-80GB VRAM and benefit from professional-grade cards. Large-scale operations running 70B+ parameter models or serving many concurrent users need 80GB+ VRAM and enterprise-class hardware with maximum memory bandwidth.

GPU comparison summary

Top GPU recommendations by category

Enterprise and professional solutions

The NVIDIA H100 represents the gold standard for professional LLM inference. Its 80GB of HBM3 memory handles the largest production models, while tensor cores optimized for transformer architectures deliver exceptional performance. The high memory bandwidth enables fast token generation and efficient batch processing for serving multiple users simultaneously. Organizations running customer-facing AI applications or processing high-volume inference workloads see significant returns on the substantial investment.

The NVIDIA A100 offers compelling value for enterprises that need serious performance without the H100's premium price. With 80GB of memory, it runs the same large models as the H100, though with somewhat lower throughput. The A100's widespread adoption means excellent software support and availability across major cloud providers. Companies building internal AI tools or running medium-scale inference operations find the A100 delivers professional capabilities at a more accessible price point.

The NVIDIA L40 provides a balanced option for organizations that need substantial inference capability but don't require the absolute maximum performance. Its 48GB of memory handles most production models effectively, while the lower power consumption reduces operational costs. The L40 works well for companies running multiple smaller models simultaneously or deploying AI applications that combine inference with other GPU workloads like rendering or visualization.

Creator and developer solutions

The RTX 4090 delivers exceptional performance for individual developers and small teams working on LLM projects. Its 24GB of VRAM handles 7B to 13B parameter models comfortably, making it suitable for most development and prototyping work. The strong compute performance enables reasonable inference speeds, while the consumer price point makes it accessible to independent developers and startups. Developer workflows like fine-tuning smaller models, running experiments, and building AI applications work well within the 4090's capabilities.

The RTX 3090 serves as the entry point for serious LLM development work on a budget. While older, its 24GB of memory still accommodates many useful models, and the reduced price makes it attractive for hobbyists and students learning about LLMs. Performance lags behind newer cards, but remains adequate for educational purposes, personal projects, and small-scale applications. The 3090 proves that meaningful LLM work doesn't require the latest hardware.

The NVIDIA L4 excels for developers focused specifically on inference rather than training. Its power efficiency and compact form factor suit edge deployments and applications where energy costs matter. While the 24GB memory limits model size options, the L4 handles popular models like Llama 7B and 13B variants effectively. Developers building chatbots, content generation tools, or embedding services find the L4 provides solid performance at reasonable operating costs.

Task complexity and GPU memory requirements

Small-scale projects typically involve running 7B parameter models for personal use, learning, or prototype development. These require 14-20GB of VRAM and work well on RTX 4090, RTX 3090, or L4 GPUs. Example applications include personal coding assistants, creative writing tools, or educational experiments with language models. Users can run models like Llama 7B, Mistral 7B, or similar-sized alternatives for chat, text completion, and basic reasoning tasks.

Medium-scale deployments handle 13B to 30B parameter models for small business applications or advanced development work. These need 32-60GB of VRAM and benefit from A100, L40, or multiple consumer GPUs. Use cases include customer service chatbots, content generation for marketing teams, code analysis tools for development shops, and specialized domain models for professional applications. Models like Llama 13B/30B, CodeLlama variants, and fine-tuned business-specific models operate effectively at this scale.

Large-scale operations run 70B+ parameter models or serve many concurrent users across enterprise applications. These require 80GB+ VRAM and demand H100, A100, or multi-GPU setups. Applications include customer-facing AI products, large-scale content generation, advanced reasoning systems, and multi-modal AI applications. Organizations at this level typically run models like Llama 70B, GPT-3.5/4 class models, or custom models trained for specific enterprise use cases.

Optimization techniques help stretch GPU capabilities across all scales. Quantization reduces model size by using lower precision numbers, allowing larger models to fit in available memory with minimal quality loss. Memory-efficient attention mechanisms reduce peak memory usage during inference. Model sharding distributes large models across multiple GPUs when single-card solutions prove insufficient. These techniques enable running larger models on smaller hardware, though often with some trade-offs in speed or quality.

Data Center vs. Cloud: Making the Right Choice

When choosing between on-premises hardware and cloud services for LLM inference, you're making a trade-off between control and convenience.

On-Premises Advantages

You get complete control over your hardware and infrastructure. This means you can tune everything for your specific models and workloads without being constrained by a cloud provider's configuration choices. For organizations running inference constantly, the economics work in your favor after the initial investment. You also avoid data transfer costs and can keep sensitive models and data entirely within your infrastructure.

On-Premises Disadvantages

The upfront cost is substantial. A single H100 costs around $30,000, and most serious LLM inference setups need multiple GPUs. You'll also need to handle power, cooling, networking, and maintenance yourself. This requires technical expertise and ongoing operational overhead that many organizations underestimate.

Cloud Advantages

You can scale up or down instantly based on demand. Need to handle a traffic spike? Spin up more instances. Testing a new model? Try it without buying hardware first. Cloud providers handle all the infrastructure complexity, and you only pay for what you use.

Cloud Disadvantages

Costs accumulate quickly for sustained workloads. You're also constrained by the provider's hardware choices and may face bandwidth limitations when moving large models or datasets. Some organizations worry about data security or model intellectual property in shared environments.

Current 2025 Cloud GPU Pricing

Here's what you'll pay per hour for the main GPU options:

• NVIDIA B200: Starting at $2.40/hour
• NVIDIA H200: $3.83–$10/hour
• NVIDIA H100: $3–$10/hour
• NVIDIA A100: ~$1.50/hour
• NVIDIA L4: ~$0.75/hour
• NVIDIA L40: ~$1.00/hour
• NVIDIA A40: ~$0.50/hour
• NVIDIA A30: ~$0.70/hour

Major Cloud Providers

AWS offers the broadest GPU selection and mature ML services but often at premium pricing. Google Cloud excels at TPU integration and has strong AI/ML tooling. Microsoft Azure integrates well with enterprise workflows and offers competitive GPU pricing. Smaller providers like CoreWeave and Lambda Labs often provide better pricing for pure compute needs without the additional services overhead.

Decision Framework

Choose on-premises when:

• You run inference continuously (>4-6 hours daily)
• You need complete control over hardware configuration
• Data security or compliance requires keeping everything internal
• You have technical staff to manage GPU infrastructure
• Your workload is predictable and doesn't need frequent scaling

Choose cloud when:

• Your inference workload is sporadic or unpredictable
• You want to test different models before committing to hardware
• You lack the technical staff to manage GPU infrastructure
• You need to scale rapidly for traffic spikes
• Your startup or project budget can't handle large upfront costs

Simple Cost Comparison

Consider an H100 costing $30,000 upfront versus $5/hour in the cloud. The break-even point is around 6,000 hours of usage, or about 3.4 years of 5 hours daily use. But this ignores power, cooling, and maintenance costs for on-premises, which typically add 20-30% to operational expenses.

For many organizations, a hybrid approach works best: own hardware for baseline workloads and use cloud for peaks or experimentation.

What Else Should I Be Thinking About?

Storage Needs

Modern LLMs can require hundreds of gigabytes or terabytes of storage. You need fast storage (NVMe SSDs) to avoid bottlenecking your expensive GPUs during model loading. Plan for both capacity and speed, especially if you're switching between different models frequently.

Networking Requirements

Multi-GPU setups need high-bandwidth, low-latency connections between GPUs. Look for systems with NVLink or similar interconnects. If you're serving inference over the internet, consider your bandwidth needs carefully - nobody wants a fast GPU serving a slow connection.

Monitoring and Performance Tuning

GPU utilization monitoring helps you understand if you're getting your money's worth. Tools like nvidia-smi give basic metrics, but you'll want more sophisticated monitoring for production workloads. Performance tuning involves optimizing batch sizes, memory usage, and model quantization settings.

Security and Compliance

If you're handling sensitive data or proprietary models, plan your security architecture carefully. This includes secure model storage, encrypted data transmission, and access controls. Some industries have specific compliance requirements that affect where and how you can process data.

Power and Cooling

High-end GPUs consume substantial power. An H100 can draw 700W under full load. Factor in cooling costs, which often match power consumption costs in data center environments. Inadequate cooling will throttle performance and reduce hardware lifespan.

Workflow Automation and Integration

Consider how GPU inference fits into your broader software stack. You'll likely need orchestration tools, API gateways, load balancers, and monitoring systems. The GPU is just one piece of a larger system that needs to work together smoothly.

Conclusion

The best GPU for LLM inference depends entirely on your specific requirements, usage patterns, and budget constraints. There's no universal answer that works for every organization.

Three key takeaways: First, the H100 and H200 offer the highest performance for demanding workloads, but the A100 provides excellent value for many inference tasks. Second, cloud services make sense for variable workloads while on-premises hardware wins for sustained usage. Third, your success depends on the entire infrastructure stack, not just the GPU choice.

The LLM inference landscape changes rapidly. Hardware gets faster, software gets more efficient, and new optimization techniques emerge regularly. Stay informed about developments in both hardware and software to make sure your infrastructure decisions remain optimal as the technology evolves.

```